Syntax highlighter

2021-11-26

JWT と愉快な仲間たち

多分2017年くらいにやるかと思って放置していた JWT 周りのサポートをようやく重い腰をあげて完了した。一応、現時点て RFC になってるものは全部入れたはず(EdDSA とか ES256K とか)。ドラフトの ECDH-1PU はそのうちファイナルになったらサポートするかもしれない。

こんな感じで使える。

(import (rnrs)
        (rfc jwt)
        (rfc jwk)
        (rfc jwe)
        (rfc jws)
        (rfc uuid)
        (crypto)
        (srfi :19)
        (math ec) ;; for ec-parameters
        (sagittarius combinators))

(define keypair (generate-key-pair Ed25519))
(define alg 'EdDSA)
;; If you want to use other algorighm and keys
;; (define keypair (generate-key-pair ECDSA :ec-parameter NIST-P-256))
;; (define alg 'ES256)
;; (define keypair (generate-key-pair RSA :size 2048))
;; (define alg 'PS512)

(define claims
  (jwt-claims-builder
   (iss "Sagittarius Scheme")
   (aud "All saints")
   (sub "Use Sagittarius")
   (iat (current-time))
   (nbf (add-duration (current-time) (make-time time-duration 0 -1)))
   (exp (add-duration (current-time) (make-time time-duration 0 600)))
   (jti (uuid->string (make-v4-uuid)))))

(define jws-header
  (jws-header-builder
   (alg alg)))

(define payload (string->utf8 (jwt-claims->json-string claims)))
(define jws-object (make-jws-object jws-header payload))

(define signer (private-key->jws-signer (keypair-private keypair)))

(define jwk
  (public-key->jwk (keypair-public keypair)
                   (jwk-config-builder (kid "my key"))))
(define jwks (make-jwk-set (list jwk)))

(let ((jwt-object (jws:sign jws-object signer)))
  ;; Share the JWT to 3rd party
  ;; (jws:serialize jwt-object)
  ;; (jwk-set->json-string jwks)

  ;; Verify the JWT token with the public key
  (let* ((kid-matcher (jwk-matcher:kid "my key"))
         (verifier (public-key->jws-verifier
                    (jwk-set:find-key jwks kid-matcher)))
         (jwt-consumer (jwt-consumer-builder
                        (verifier verifier)
                        (claims-validator
                         (compose jwt:iss-required-validator
                                  jwt:sub-required-validator
                                  jwt:aud-required-validator
                                  jwt:exp-required-validator
                                  jwt:nbf-required-validator
                                  jwt:iat-required-validator
                                  jwt:jti-required-validator
                                  (jwt:iss-value-validator "Sagittarius Scheme"
                                                           "Sagittarius")
                                  (jwt:sub-value-validator "Use Sagittarius")
                                  (jwt:aud-value-validator "All saints")
                                  (jwt:nbf-validator)
                                  (jwt:exp-validator)))))
         (claims (jwt:consume jwt-consumer jwt-object)))
    ;; use the user claim
    (jwt-claims-aud claims))) ;; retrieve 'aud' field
上記はおそらく 90% 以上くらいの JWT ユーザーが使っているであろう JWS を用いたもの。(個人的に JWE を JWT として使ってるのアプリを見たことがない)
っで、以下が JWE を作る方法
(import (rnrs)
        (rfc jwe)
        (rfc jwk))

(define jwk-bob
  (json-string->jwk
   "{\"kty\":\"EC\",
     \"crv\":\"P-256\",
     \"x\":\"weNJy2HscCSM6AEDTDg04biOvhFhyyWvOHQfeF_PxMQ\",
     \"y\":\"e8lnCO-AlStT-NJVX-crhB7QRYhiix03illJOVAOyck\",
     \"d\":\"VEmDZpDXXK8p8N0Cndsxs924q6nS1RXFASRl6BfUqdw\"}"))

(define jwe-header
  (jwe-header-builder
   (alg 'ECDH-ES+A128KW)
   (enc 'A128GCM)
   (apu "QWxpY2U")
   (apv "Qm9i")))

;; Alice wants to encrypt with Bob's public key
(define alice-encryptor (make-ecdh-jwe-encryptor (jwk->public-key jwk-bob)))

;; Bob needs to decrypt Alice's message with his private key
(define bob-decryptor (make-ecdh-jwe-decryptor jwk-bob))

(define secret-key (string->utf8 "down the rabbit hole"))

(let ((jwe-object (jwe:encrypt alice-encryptor jwe-header secret-key)))
  (jwe:serialize jwe-object)
  (let ((secret-key (jwe:decrypt bob-decryptor jwe-object)))
    (utf8->string secret-key)))
基本的な使用感は Java の Nimbus JOSE + JWT を参考にしているが、JWT Consumer は多分違う。ライブラリがいくつにも分かれているのは単なる趣味。よく使われる JWS を整合性チェックに用いるのは (rfc jwk)(rfc jws) だけで済むとかまぁ、そういう感じにしたかったからという。

No comments:

Post a Comment